Bank of Canada speeches are usually informative, but some provide rare, critical insights into how policy is formulated. On March 2, Deputy Governor Sharon Kozicki delivered two interconnected addresses in Oslo ahead of the Bank’s upcoming five-year monetary policy framework renewal. Her speeches offer valuable guidance for investors, highlighting how the Bank intends to navigate an increasingly volatile global environment increasingly shaped by persistent supply-side disruptions rather than by traditional demand cycles. The central message is clear: Canada’s 2 per cent inflation target is not changing, but the Bank’s approach to managing deviations from that target is evolving materially.
The Core Analytical Framework: A New Inflation Regime
Before the pandemic, the Canadian economy was typically in either excess supply with inflation below target, or excess demand with inflation above target — situations that rarely required difficult trade-offs. The post-pandemic world has changed this calculus fundamentally. Supply-side shocks now more frequently push the economy into the most uncomfortable quadrant: weak economic activity combined with above-target inflation, where tightening policy to fight inflation risks deepening economic weakness, while easing to support growth risks entrenching elevated prices.
The primary drivers of this new regime include the reconfiguration of global trade, the rise of artificial intelligence, population aging, geopolitical tensions, and more frequent extreme weather events. Kozicki drew an important distinction between temporary supply shocks and deeper structural change that permanently alters the economy’s productive capacity. As a current example, U.S. tariff policy has already reduced Canadian exports by roughly 5 per cent since President Trump’s re-election in 2024, weighing on growth while uncertainty over trade arrangements continues to delay business investment.
Policy Response: When to Act, When to Wait
A critical insight for investors is Kozicki’s framework for deciding when the Bank will “look through” above-target inflation and when it will act, even if doing so risks further economic weakness. The decision hinges on three factors. First, the size and persistence of the inflationary impact: small or short-lived shocks warrant patience, but larger, more persistent impacts require a policy response, as waiting too long risks unanchoring inflation expectations and ultimately demands a harsher intervention that causes greater economic damage. Second, the nature of the trade-off: if a shock is primarily inflationary with limited damage to output, tightening is more likely; if the shock weighs heavily on growth with only modest inflationary effects, easing may be more appropriate. Third, the breadth of the price impact across the economy matters, since monetary policy is a blunt instrument and cannot selectively target a single sector.
What the Bank Is Doing: Three Operational Pillars
The Bank is strengthening its tools for diagnosis and risk management across three fronts. First is enhanced multi-sector modelling and scenario analysis. For example, the tariff scenarios included in the 2025 Monetary Policy Reports stress-tested policy paths and identified “dark corner” outcomes that might be missed by focusing too narrowly on base-case projections. Second is expanded intelligence gathering beyond traditional macroeconomic data. The Bank is increasingly drawing on sources such as credit and debit card transactions, border freight flows, and direct outreach to businesses and households. The Business Leaders’ Pulse survey has proven particularly valuable for gauging how long firms expect trade tensions to persist and whether they plan to pass higher costs on to customers. Third, and most relevant for market participants, is a commitment to more transparent communication. The Bank intends to explicitly convey what it knows, what it does not know, and the conditions under which policy could shift in either direction.
Key Takeaways for Investors
The 2 per cent inflation target remains anchored and non-negotiable. The Bank’s credibility, built over the past 25 years, is its most valuable asset and will not be compromised.
The policy reaction function is now explicitly context-dependent. Rate decisions will be shaped by the Bank’s diagnosis of each shock — its size, persistence, breadth, and whether it constitutes temporary disruption or structural change. Reading CPI or GDP in isolation will be insufficient to anticipate the Bank’s next move.
Surprises in both directions remain possible. The Bank may tighten policy even when the economy is weak, or ease even when inflation is above target, depending on its assessment of the underlying shock. Investors should avoid binary assumptions about the rate path.
Communication itself has become a policy tool. Scenario discussions and explicit framing of uncertainty in Bank of Canada publications should be interpreted as substantive signals, not boilerplate. Monitor them closely.
Finally, Canada’s trade exposure remains the dominant risk variable. U.S. tariff policy is not a temporary disruption but a structural force that will shape the Bank’s deliberations throughout 2026 and beyond.
Housing Affordability Watch
CMI monitors the latest developments and offers insights on solutions to Canada’s housing affordability crisis
Canada’s modular construction sector offers a promising solution to the country’s housing challenges, delivering homes faster, with higher quality and potentially lower costs than traditional on-site building.
In practice, however, a fragmented regulatory landscape is impeding broader adoption and making it difficult to realize these benefits.
In the latest Housing Affordability Watch, we examine the regulatory challenges facing modular construction, the steps being taken to streamline the process, and what still needs to be done.
Read it here: The Regulatory Challenges to Modular Construction
Independent Opinion
The views and opinions expressed in this publication are solely and independently those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of any person or organization in any way affiliated with the author including, without limitation, any current or past employers of the author. While reasonable effort was taken to ensure the information and analysis in this publication is accurate, it has been prepared solely for general informational purposes. Any opinions, projections, or forward-looking statements expressed herein are solely those of the author. There are no warranties or representations being provided with respect to the accuracy and completeness of the content in this publication. Nothing in this publication should be construed as providing professional advice including investment advice on the matters discussed. The author does not assume any liability arising from any form of reliance on this publication. Readers are cautioned to always seek independent professional advice from a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
